Major Premier League figures granted anonymity in alleged teen sex abuse case

A Premier League leader has won a High Court anonymity order to prevent his identity from being revealed in a civil case over alleged sexual abuse of teenage girls.

The man, a well-known figure in England’s top flight, is suing for serious damages by a woman who claims the offenses allegedly occurred in the 1990s when she was just 15.

However, his lawyers successfully argued to a High Court judge that an order should be made to protect his name from disclosure by the media.

According to court documents, the order was issued Competitor, to “protect the interests of the defendant” and “ensure the impartiality of justice.” The judge in the case ruled that “there was no sufficient countervailing public interest in the disclosure of information.”

As a result, the case does not name the defendants in legal documents, which say the defendants are accused of sexual abuse and “violation of the person of the plaintiff (battery and battery) with intent to cause injury.” This is said to have caused psychological harm to his alleged victims.

Lawyers representing the man have made a detailed case to the High Court of Queen’s Bench, arguing that his identity should be protected because of the potential impact on him.

Although UK privacy rules allow suspects to remain anonymous in the early stages of police investigations (the rules only change when those involved are charged), this generally does not apply in civil cases where alleged sex abusers are sued for damages.

Competitor It can also be revealed that the same man is also being investigated by police over a number of other non-recent sex offences, including previous allegations of rape and sexual abuse of teenage girls.

In a statement, the police force said it had “received a number of allegations relating to non-recent sexual offences”. Our specialist officers investigated and obtained the victim’s account.

“After consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service and acting on their advice, we have decided that we will not take further action on a number of the allegations.”

The decision was made earlier this year.

The alleged victim in the civil case contacted the same police force in late 2021 and her complaint was referred to the force’s specialized unit that investigates sex crimes against young people under the age of 16. She claimed the rape occurred at the man’s home.

However, detectives investigating her complaint realized it was affected by a little-known legal anomaly – under the Sexual Offenses Act 1956, legislation enacted by the British Parliament at the time for England and Wales – – Children’s charity NSPCC called the bill “devastating” and “heartbreaking” for those it opposes.

Police told her she had waited too long to report the matter because legislation states that if the alleged offense took place between 1956 and 2004 and the alleged victim is a girl aged 13 to 15 , she must file a complaint within a year.

This time limit was abandoned when the Sexual Offenses Act 2003 came into force in May 2004, but it still applies if the alleged assault occurred within the past 48 years. The bill only applies to girls aged 13 to 15, not boys.

After what police described as a complex investigation, the Crown Prosecution Service decided to take no further action. The man was not arrested and a case was opened.

Although the man’s identity is being protected, it is understood the Football Association’s safeguarding department is aware of the allegations against him.

This is relevant in this case because if the FA knew that someone within the sport had been charged with a child sex offense – in theory, that person posed a potential risk to girls or boys of a certain age – it had powers Carry out a risk assessment report and, if necessary, make an interim suspension order against the person while the matter is investigated.

As it stands, the man continues to work in football and although he may have close relationships with women’s football players and players, he is not believed to be subject to any protective measures.

The FA statement read: “We have strong safeguards in place and all cases referred to us are dealt with in accordance with our policies and procedures. “We investigate and assess all possible concerns about children and children in football. We do not comment on individual cases where there are allegations and concerns about individuals who pose a risk of harm and, where applicable, appropriate safeguarding measures are put in place in accordance with the FA’s safeguarding regulations.

If you would like to speak to someone who has read this article, you can call Samaritans UK anytime for free on 116 123 from any phone.

(Above: George Wood/Getty Images)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *