Nottingham Forest: Nuno says club feels VAR’s anger is justified


Image Source, Getty Images

illustrate, One of the penalties Forest wanted was Ashley Young’s handball

  • author, Nick Macht
  • Role, Senior football journalist

Nuno Espirito Santo says he feels vindicated after he and Nottingham Forest suffered heated complaints following their defeat to Everton.

Forest had three penalty claims in the 2-0 defeat, but all were dismissed despite the critical match incident panel and referees chief Howard Webb confirming one of the calls was in error.

Minutes after the final whistle last month, the club released an angry statement on (VAR) Stuart Attwell is said to be a fan of relegation rivals Luton.

Nuno also said the referees’ play was “poor” and confirmed he had responded to the Football Association’s request for observation following his post-match comments.

The FA also asked defender Neco Williams and the club’s refereeing analyst Mark Clattenburg to comment, but Webber admitted one of the decisions – Ashley Young’s tackle on Callum Hudson-Odoi The ball – should have been a penalty, and Nuno believed their protest was justified.

“When someone, an expert, says they [the referees) got it wrong and what you said and saw was right,” said Nuno, speaking before Saturday’s trip to Sheffield United with Forest a point above the relegation zone.

“It makes you feel more comfortable but it doesn’t give you back what happened.”

Skip Twitter content

Allow Twitter content?

This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Twitter cookie policy and privacy policy before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.

Warning: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

End of Twitter content

Nuno insisted he “still believes” all three decisions should have resulted in spot-kicks.

He added: “The PGMOL clearly said the third one was a penalty but unfortunately they [the officials on the day] Got it wrong. It has happened before, where a panel made a decision and said the opposite was true. We can’t bother with that.

“I always try to be respectful and I try to understand how hard a referee’s job is but this year it’s been difficult. There’s so much going on. I feel like I can’t control my emotions and that’s why I’ve become so outspoken.

Nuno now hopes to avoid a ban after submitting a response to the FA.

He said: “I read it, I agreed and signed it. We are still waiting. Hopefully I won’t be punished and can be on the touchline.

Forest are expected to face charges from the FA and Premier League over the outburst following the defeat.

It was revealed this week that the key match incident panel agreed that Forest should have been awarded a penalty when Young brought down Hudson-Odoi in the 55th minute of the game at Goodison Park on April 21.

The club is calling for the audio between video assistant referee Atwell and on-field official Anthony Taylor to be released publicly and for PGMOL to give them the opportunity to listen privately.

Nuno also called for Forest’s situation in the league to be resolved and they will continue to wait for the appeal decision.

They have yet to hear whether their appeal against a four-point penalty for breaching profit and sustainability rules is successful.

The game took place last Wednesday in front of an independent commission, meaning the Premier League has no control over the timing of the match.

Unlike the independent committee that heard Forest’s original case, there is no seven-day deadline for resolution of the case, but it will be finalized before the end of the season.

“It’s a mess. They had enough time. It’s a mess,” said Nuno, who has previously described the situation in similar terms. “It’s very difficult not only for us but also for the league. It’s very difficult to be in this situation.

“We’ve been dealing with this situation for a while and we’ve been hoping it would come sooner so we could know exactly how many points we have. Do we have 30, 29, 28, 27? We need to get it as soon as possible.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *